indyanguy
06-13 05:18 PM
As understand the process
1) First one should change the employer with new job.
2) Apply for new Labor (with EB2 requirements) -- PERM 3 months.
3) Apply for new I-140 (use old I-485) -- PREMIUM 1 month.
4) No need to apply for NEW I-485.
Guys, this is the best option for EB3, use it.. with in 4 months you are current... let us port to EB2...no need to wait this VISA bulletin saga.
If my EB3 140 is pending and if when I apply for EB2 140, I dont have the approval, can the interfile be done at the later date?
I am seriously considering porting my date. Any idea how much approx it would cost for the PERM + 140 process (lawyer and USCIS fee)?
1) First one should change the employer with new job.
2) Apply for new Labor (with EB2 requirements) -- PERM 3 months.
3) Apply for new I-140 (use old I-485) -- PREMIUM 1 month.
4) No need to apply for NEW I-485.
Guys, this is the best option for EB3, use it.. with in 4 months you are current... let us port to EB2...no need to wait this VISA bulletin saga.
If my EB3 140 is pending and if when I apply for EB2 140, I dont have the approval, can the interfile be done at the later date?
I am seriously considering porting my date. Any idea how much approx it would cost for the PERM + 140 process (lawyer and USCIS fee)?
wallpaper Vanessa Hudgens Ecko Red
Pegasus503
02-11 06:28 PM
When will Jan 2007 become current?
ROW?
China?
Mexico?
Philippines?
India?
EB1 is current for all
EB2 is current except for China (1 Jan 03) but India is unavailable.
EB3 varies bewteen Apr 01 and Nov 02 depending on the area
roll on 1st March for new dates to be effective.
ROW?
China?
Mexico?
Philippines?
India?
EB1 is current for all
EB2 is current except for China (1 Jan 03) but India is unavailable.
EB3 varies bewteen Apr 01 and Nov 02 depending on the area
roll on 1st March for new dates to be effective.
sanju
07-14 05:34 PM
A few days I called Comcast to disconnect CNN and CNN headlines from my cable. The Comcast representative was surprised as to why I want to cut CNN. She transferred me to her supervisor. The supervisor noted down my complaint and said that he will get back to me in 3 business days. Next day I got a call from Comcast that they will block CNN entirely from my cable. I thanked them as I will not have bigotry coming into my house anymore.
2011 vanessa stella hudgens mom
akhilmahajan
02-11 01:06 PM
I think the new name check change, will help the system work FIFO.
This is what the system is intended to do.
Also, as time goes by, this will make the PD more transparent, so instead of having dreams and making wild guesses, there can be somewhat logical guessing.
I know it is not possible as it is USCIS and anything can be true.
But i am really happy for people with older PD's who have been struck with FBI Name checks.
Please help IV with the letter campaign and also lets get together and try to make the system more transparent and open.
GO IV GO. TOGTHER WE CAN.
This is what the system is intended to do.
Also, as time goes by, this will make the PD more transparent, so instead of having dreams and making wild guesses, there can be somewhat logical guessing.
I know it is not possible as it is USCIS and anything can be true.
But i am really happy for people with older PD's who have been struck with FBI Name checks.
Please help IV with the letter campaign and also lets get together and try to make the system more transparent and open.
GO IV GO. TOGTHER WE CAN.
more...
Macaca
01-27 06:58 PM
It is normal and healthy to (dis)agree as long as
1. comment is related to topic,
2. tone is civil and respectful, and
3. people don't forget the big picture.
Please generate the above slightly modified reminder when a member posts in a forum.
Hope it has some effect. Thanks Paskal!
1. comment is related to topic,
2. tone is civil and respectful, and
3. people don't forget the big picture.
Please generate the above slightly modified reminder when a member posts in a forum.
Hope it has some effect. Thanks Paskal!
anilsal
10-12 12:02 PM
there was one person who went to the airport to get the I-94 corrected. Wrong date was entered or such.
more...
MahaBharatGC
04-16 08:15 PM
You do not need a lawyer. Just make sure CIS has your correct mailing address and keep watching your cases regularly for RFEs.
In the event of an RFE, you can respond on your own most of the times. If you think it requires a complex response or if you are not confident, you can hire a lawyer at that point to respond to that RFE.
I would even say handling your case on your own is safer as I know some cases where the lawyer goofed up by not responding to RFEs. The applicant was not even watching his case status as he had left everything to the attorney and he had no idea about the RFE.
It is also not necessary to inform CIS about your job change unless there is a possibility that your previous employer may revoke your 140.
kaisersose - thanx for your input....
I am not moving so address change might not be issue......and I like your suggestion of watching the case online ourselves....
regards!
In the event of an RFE, you can respond on your own most of the times. If you think it requires a complex response or if you are not confident, you can hire a lawyer at that point to respond to that RFE.
I would even say handling your case on your own is safer as I know some cases where the lawyer goofed up by not responding to RFEs. The applicant was not even watching his case status as he had left everything to the attorney and he had no idea about the RFE.
It is also not necessary to inform CIS about your job change unless there is a possibility that your previous employer may revoke your 140.
kaisersose - thanx for your input....
I am not moving so address change might not be issue......and I like your suggestion of watching the case online ourselves....
regards!
2010 vanessa hudgens and stella
samcam
05-24 12:55 PM
done...
more...
snathan
03-16 01:53 PM
Stop advertising a lawyer. I find him very speculative. He wants everyone to come to his site and you are falling for it.
Sometimes I also feel the same about him.
Sometimes I also feel the same about him.
hair vanessa hudgens and stella
nat23
03-27 02:47 PM
Wish we would not getinto United States Civics discussions and concentrate on Increasing memberships and contributing.
Dont forget the goal....there are a lot of hurdles ahead as pointed out by Sen Durbin and elk already
To have a meaningful discussion / resolution to our problems we should be aware of the process.
Dont forget the goal....there are a lot of hurdles ahead as pointed out by Sen Durbin and elk already
To have a meaningful discussion / resolution to our problems we should be aware of the process.
more...
gc_dreamer_485
10-10 04:43 PM
And Yeah i do have a new Passport now
hot Do you know Vanessa Hudgens?
TomPlate
07-16 10:44 PM
Medical Examination is going to be really bad once more. It is going to be a long queue. Keep on trying by calling the doctors and do not rely near by doctors. If you are in near by MA I suggest you Dr. Sanjeev Sharma really a great and reliable doctor we can trust. Where are you by the way????
more...
house vanessa hudgens and stella hudgens 2009. vanessa hudgens waiting at
sroym
06-16 09:56 PM
As a non-indian joining IV lately, I feel IV is more an indian organization. I had communication with one of the moderators (core members of IV) and he clearly stated that retrogession is in IV's agenda, but FBI name check is not in IV's agenda as an organization. How come retrogession which is mostly a problem for indian immigrants in the agenda of this organization, but FBI name check which is a problem for most nationalities not in the agenda of this group(maybe with the exception of Europeans)? There are over 100 members at a yahoo group, and some more registered at an immigrationportal forum with common problem of FBI name check, cases delayed for 1, 2, 3 or more years because of name check. The registered use names suggest that there are from all over the world, yet no core members of IV is caring about this matter with the exception of one person who scheduled a conference call with an attorney in PA, but did not help any more. Sorry about my humble sincere feeling.
tattoo Stella Hudgens middot; Vanessa
srikondoji
02-05 11:04 AM
You guys all are excellent. I never thought that this thread would grow as much as it did.
To Admin: Please start seperate thread for each consulate, where people can share their experiences and ask specific questions.
Now coming back to my question. My labor is approved and I-140 is pending.
I have declared that my employer is applying for my GC.
Should i carry documents proving that my I-140 is pending and that labor is approved?
My 6th year H1-B will be expiring in Aug 31 2007 and i have valid I-797 approved upto that date. I know i can get 3 years extension anytime with approved I-140 or atleast 1 year H1-B extension.
Will that be a problem at all? I am asking this because, the numbe rof months for which stamping will be valid will be just few months.
Thanks again for wonderful answers.
--sri
To Admin: Please start seperate thread for each consulate, where people can share their experiences and ask specific questions.
Now coming back to my question. My labor is approved and I-140 is pending.
I have declared that my employer is applying for my GC.
Should i carry documents proving that my I-140 is pending and that labor is approved?
My 6th year H1-B will be expiring in Aug 31 2007 and i have valid I-797 approved upto that date. I know i can get 3 years extension anytime with approved I-140 or atleast 1 year H1-B extension.
Will that be a problem at all? I am asking this because, the numbe rof months for which stamping will be valid will be just few months.
Thanks again for wonderful answers.
--sri
more...
pictures Vanessa Hudgens
desi3933
03-02 04:08 PM
Thanks. One question, I may not have asked it properly:
What I had (mis-) understood till date was: there were 2 ways for employment based GC: 1) if I was outside US all along, and the employer applied my employment based GC for future employment, and 2) if I was working in US for the employer and he applied for my EB2 GC based on the job that I was offered and was working on.
Both are for future employment.
1) means immigrant visa at consulate abroad (consular processing)
2) choice of immigrant visa at consulate abroad OR I-485 application to adjust status
It is possible to switch from I-485 to immigrant visa abroad by filing I-824 with NVC.
_______________________
Not a legal advice.
US citizen of Indian origin
What I had (mis-) understood till date was: there were 2 ways for employment based GC: 1) if I was outside US all along, and the employer applied my employment based GC for future employment, and 2) if I was working in US for the employer and he applied for my EB2 GC based on the job that I was offered and was working on.
Both are for future employment.
1) means immigrant visa at consulate abroad (consular processing)
2) choice of immigrant visa at consulate abroad OR I-485 application to adjust status
It is possible to switch from I-485 to immigrant visa abroad by filing I-824 with NVC.
_______________________
Not a legal advice.
US citizen of Indian origin
dresses Vanessa Hudgens
harsh
05-24 12:27 PM
Done!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep it going guys.
more...
makeup Vanessa Hudgens: Waikiki
hanu0913
08-13 07:57 PM
Originally Posted by ImmiUser
Hi Ron,
DOS moved the bulletin further for EB2 India. I remember you were telling in earlier blogs that you have got information from DOS that there are only a handful of visas left over. So I am not sure what DOS/USCIS is up to. USICIS is adjudicating all the applications for PD 2006 and beyond while putting the 2004 and 2005 applications in dark.
It would have been much helpful had DOS put forth the no. of visas still left over.
What's your take on the latest visa bulletin.
Thanks
Answer by Ron
They did say that they only had "a handful" of visas left. This advance is not necessarily inconsistent with that earlier statement. In order to use up visas and avoid waste, the Visa Office has to manage the quota to make sure that there are enough applications AND ADJUDICATIONS to exhaust the quota. They have no control over the CIS, but they do have control over the overseas consular posts.
What this tells me is that the CIS is doing nothing (or next to nothing) to use up India and China E2 numbers. By advancing the cutoff dates last month, VO was able to make more cases at overseas posts available for close out. Since the CIS obviously did not use many China/India E2 numbers in July and August, VO has had to advance the cutoff dates again to make enough cases pending at consular posts available to use up those few remaining numbers.
__________________
Hi Ron,
DOS moved the bulletin further for EB2 India. I remember you were telling in earlier blogs that you have got information from DOS that there are only a handful of visas left over. So I am not sure what DOS/USCIS is up to. USICIS is adjudicating all the applications for PD 2006 and beyond while putting the 2004 and 2005 applications in dark.
It would have been much helpful had DOS put forth the no. of visas still left over.
What's your take on the latest visa bulletin.
Thanks
Answer by Ron
They did say that they only had "a handful" of visas left. This advance is not necessarily inconsistent with that earlier statement. In order to use up visas and avoid waste, the Visa Office has to manage the quota to make sure that there are enough applications AND ADJUDICATIONS to exhaust the quota. They have no control over the CIS, but they do have control over the overseas consular posts.
What this tells me is that the CIS is doing nothing (or next to nothing) to use up India and China E2 numbers. By advancing the cutoff dates last month, VO was able to make more cases at overseas posts available for close out. Since the CIS obviously did not use many China/India E2 numbers in July and August, VO has had to advance the cutoff dates again to make enough cases pending at consular posts available to use up those few remaining numbers.
__________________
girlfriend that Vanessa Hudgens and
suriajay12
09-16 06:36 AM
I would consult an expert attorney and ASAP.
Ajay.
Ajay.
hairstyles Stella Hudgens (Vanessa
ramus
06-14 05:47 PM
Yes, even though July VB brought good things and everybody is busy in getting documents together, we should also take some time and look in to this.
The July VB has distracted us. Should re-mobilize quickly. Shouldn't rest till favourable amendments are in.........
The July VB has distracted us. Should re-mobilize quickly. Shouldn't rest till favourable amendments are in.........
leo2606
12-27 07:13 AM
Hey, thanks for the info.
inline...
inline...
rbharol
01-23 11:41 PM
"Representative Elton Gallegly (R-CA) introduced H.R. 133, Citizenship Reform Act of 2007, which would limit citizenship by birth to children born to at least one permanent resident or citizen parent."
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
This bill will not even be discussed.
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
This bill will not even be discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment