chandrajp
08-24 10:02 AM
If you send photos for EAD(paper filed I765) no need to have FP taken.
Only when you e-file I765, you will get a FP appointment.
BTW, what purpose do the fingerprints do on an EAD?
Your finger print will show on the EAD card
Only when you e-file I765, you will get a FP appointment.
BTW, what purpose do the fingerprints do on an EAD?
Your finger print will show on the EAD card
wallpaper Keshia Knight Pulliam#39;s
BECsufferer
01-07 08:36 PM
Indian companies like Satyam had been running these farce show of outsourcing for long time, and finally the reality is surfacing up. Not only did these companies run scam with their investors but also with their clients and employees.
As a client I see them initially low balling the real cost to obtain business and when the in-house engineering capabilities have been eliminated, they will start jacking up the prices. L&T did this with us and thankfully this month we are finally kicking their a$$ out of our facility. And we will do real engineering here in USA!
Couple of years ago, I ran into an indian at one of my visa renewals outside US consulate and he told me how, Satyam forged papers to have him slip into USA on L1 and than once here convert into H1 so he can finally apply and obtain GC. All these years he worked for remarkablly low wages.
Hope Satyam scamsters see life behind bars in India!
As a client I see them initially low balling the real cost to obtain business and when the in-house engineering capabilities have been eliminated, they will start jacking up the prices. L&T did this with us and thankfully this month we are finally kicking their a$$ out of our facility. And we will do real engineering here in USA!
Couple of years ago, I ran into an indian at one of my visa renewals outside US consulate and he told me how, Satyam forged papers to have him slip into USA on L1 and than once here convert into H1 so he can finally apply and obtain GC. All these years he worked for remarkablly low wages.
Hope Satyam scamsters see life behind bars in India!
PlainSpeak
02-25 08:41 AM
Although I agree with you on principle...that cannot bring people in numbers. There will always be people who don't agree with each other. leadership involves channeling both parties energies, those who agree with me and those who don't agree. Sounding arrogant, feeling proud of what I did better than others and looking down upon people who don't agree with me, doesn't help me, right? Who am I to judge somebody's attitude and achievements?
While i whole heartedly agree with what you stated above i don't think this idea is going to work. IV certainly will not want to take the risk of anti-immigrants being part of the advocacy effort and skewing things on the day. Messing up before the representatives will not do IV's credibility and good.
Infact all the donars in this site who keep asking me for donations would not want even me to be at the advocacy even if i donate, seeing how i disagree with them on principle. They would not want to risk me being part of the advocacy group
If i who believe in IV but does not believe in the approach as the approach does not provide relief to badly retrogressed categories is a risk for advocacy then the risk of anti immigrants being part of advocacy is even bigger
On a side note it is good to see some one from EB2 having a rational argument and calling a spade a spade
While i whole heartedly agree with what you stated above i don't think this idea is going to work. IV certainly will not want to take the risk of anti-immigrants being part of the advocacy effort and skewing things on the day. Messing up before the representatives will not do IV's credibility and good.
Infact all the donars in this site who keep asking me for donations would not want even me to be at the advocacy even if i donate, seeing how i disagree with them on principle. They would not want to risk me being part of the advocacy group
If i who believe in IV but does not believe in the approach as the approach does not provide relief to badly retrogressed categories is a risk for advocacy then the risk of anti immigrants being part of advocacy is even bigger
On a side note it is good to see some one from EB2 having a rational argument and calling a spade a spade
2011 Long straight blonde prom
Openarms
06-13 02:39 PM
As understand the process
1) First one should change the employer with new job.
2) Apply for new Labor (with EB2 requirements) -- PERM 3 months.
3) Apply for new I-140 (use old I-485) -- PREMIUM 1 month.
4) No need to apply for NEW I-485.
Guys, this is the best option for EB3, use it.. with in 4 months you are current... let us port to EB2...no need to wait this VISA bulletin saga.
1) First one should change the employer with new job.
2) Apply for new Labor (with EB2 requirements) -- PERM 3 months.
3) Apply for new I-140 (use old I-485) -- PREMIUM 1 month.
4) No need to apply for NEW I-485.
Guys, this is the best option for EB3, use it.. with in 4 months you are current... let us port to EB2...no need to wait this VISA bulletin saga.
more...
Scythe
03-29 02:53 AM
No overriding was done :P
Yes, I know. I was just saying you could have if you wanted to. You know, to narrow them down and all.
But you made the right decision, of course! :D
Yes, I know. I was just saying you could have if you wanted to. You know, to narrow them down and all.
But you made the right decision, of course! :D
helpful_leo
02-23 02:08 PM
It would be good if more of you PhDs visiting here would post and share your ideas about what we should be doing to further the PACE amendments agenda. Regular posting by you and others will bring up new ideas and more importantly, keep up everyone�s motivation to see this thing through. Once postings and interactions reach a critical mass, things will pick up momentum which will see through the completion of our agenda. So please register with IV and post here, and also make yourself aware of the broader goals of IV and how you can contribute to it.
Your ideas and posts need not be rocket science (although some of you might be rocket scientists : ) , but just a few words of encouragement or organizational ideas or just about anything- this will help and motivate others who come here. More postings will encourage still others to post and things will pick up momentum. This thread has had 654 page views but only 1 response!! Those of us who know about the S1932 bill and the campaign to get it passed in December know how effective a forum the internet and a site like this can be. Calling or e-mailing among ourselves cannot substitute the public reach and penetration of the internet, so its imperative that we keep this as the primary forum for information exchange.
Your ideas and posts need not be rocket science (although some of you might be rocket scientists : ) , but just a few words of encouragement or organizational ideas or just about anything- this will help and motivate others who come here. More postings will encourage still others to post and things will pick up momentum. This thread has had 654 page views but only 1 response!! Those of us who know about the S1932 bill and the campaign to get it passed in December know how effective a forum the internet and a site like this can be. Calling or e-mailing among ourselves cannot substitute the public reach and penetration of the internet, so its imperative that we keep this as the primary forum for information exchange.
more...
senthil1
01-23 07:15 PM
Like this lot of bills will be introduced between Jan to Dec and nothing will happen.Any immigration bill pro or anti will have tough time to pass. Generally Anti immigration will not come under consideration. Pro-immigrant bills will be considered but it will be blocked or no agreement will be reached as usual. We have to see this year. President wanted CIR not because of Welfare of immigrants but for repairing the damage caused by Iraq Mess. The problem is
Pro-immigrants are asking too much. Anti Immigrants are not willing to give anything. There is no one was trying to negotiate. Everyone wants scuttle the moves of others by politics. Instead if both anti immigrants and pro immigrants in the congress negotiate and form a compromise the bill can be passed easily. But the bill should be for the country not for one group of people.
"Representative Elton Gallegly (R-CA) introduced H.R. 133, Citizenship Reform Act of 2007, which would limit citizenship by birth to children born to at least one permanent resident or citizen parent."
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
Pro-immigrants are asking too much. Anti Immigrants are not willing to give anything. There is no one was trying to negotiate. Everyone wants scuttle the moves of others by politics. Instead if both anti immigrants and pro immigrants in the congress negotiate and form a compromise the bill can be passed easily. But the bill should be for the country not for one group of people.
"Representative Elton Gallegly (R-CA) introduced H.R. 133, Citizenship Reform Act of 2007, which would limit citizenship by birth to children born to at least one permanent resident or citizen parent."
Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..
2010 metamora high school.
vardinishankar
03-02 03:59 PM
Thanks. One question, I may not have asked it properly:
Originally Posted by vardinishankar
....
11) is it possible to switch the GC processing to "future employment", although the Labor/I-140 were approved with the understanding that I was to continue working for the same employer?
Yes. GC is always for future employment.
What I had (mis-) understood till date was: there were 2 ways for employment based GC: 1) if I was outside US all along, and the employer applied my employment based GC for future employment, and 2) if I was working in US for the employer and he applied for my EB2 GC based on the job that I was offered and was working on.
I understood that I was in the (2) category, and was wondering if my employer could switch my GC processing (Labor/I-140 approved) to the (1) type. Is this possible?
I might have got mixed up with the Consular Processing vs AoS, but from what I read, those terms would really come into picture only after the 485 stage, isn't it?
Originally Posted by vardinishankar
....
11) is it possible to switch the GC processing to "future employment", although the Labor/I-140 were approved with the understanding that I was to continue working for the same employer?
Yes. GC is always for future employment.
What I had (mis-) understood till date was: there were 2 ways for employment based GC: 1) if I was outside US all along, and the employer applied my employment based GC for future employment, and 2) if I was working in US for the employer and he applied for my EB2 GC based on the job that I was offered and was working on.
I understood that I was in the (2) category, and was wondering if my employer could switch my GC processing (Labor/I-140 approved) to the (1) type. Is this possible?
I might have got mixed up with the Consular Processing vs AoS, but from what I read, those terms would really come into picture only after the 485 stage, isn't it?
more...
rinkurazdan
05-30 01:15 PM
call ur airport, I remember a friend got his I94 extended based on new I797 at the airport.
BTW- if u have an approved I797 and an expired I94, u are not out of status....when u travel next time out of country...keep current docs with u and when u reenter...the POE officer will give u i94 based on ur latest I797..
What I dont understand is when u entered US in may 06, with a I797 of 2010, why didnt the POE officer give u i94 until 2010?
BTW- if u have an approved I797 and an expired I94, u are not out of status....when u travel next time out of country...keep current docs with u and when u reenter...the POE officer will give u i94 based on ur latest I797..
What I dont understand is when u entered US in may 06, with a I797 of 2010, why didnt the POE officer give u i94 until 2010?
hair 2011 cool quotes and sayings
anilsal
12-02 09:51 AM
It applies to cases where you already have a approval for extension that starts after the day ur current visa stamp expires. So when u travel and at POE, the officer will perform the so called "last action" and stamp till the validity of your visa stamp. This "last action" is the current status of yours and will invalidate every other action (including the approval for an extension starting after the visa stamp) that was obtained before you travelled.
Wonder if it was some PhD who devised this rule at USCIS.
Wonder if it was some PhD who devised this rule at USCIS.
more...
waitnwatch
07-14 08:31 PM
I would assume that these 10 days would be thousands of applications.
Hello,
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2008
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
Hello,
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2008
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
hot more makeup lights.
aquarianf
06-15 02:58 PM
Please share your experience with us when done.
Mine is already done last month. You may have to wait there for couple of hours if you go on weekend. But once your number comes, it will be very fast.
It takes
20 minutes - 1.5 hours - Waiting time
5 minutes for physical checkup
2 minutes for shots
1 minute for blood work and PPD
2 minutes to pay initial fee
48-72 hours for PPD results ( Since labs are very very busy, they may take upto 4 days to send them blood work report)
After 48-72 hours
30-40 minutes wait to show your ppd result
1 minute - Dr to see PPD result
10 minutes - for xray if ppd positive
5 minutes - other shots if your blood report says so
5-10 minutes - for dr to read x-ray
2 minutes to pay for remaining fees
30 minutes - wait to get your sealed envelop ( otherwise go next day)
Mine is already done last month. You may have to wait there for couple of hours if you go on weekend. But once your number comes, it will be very fast.
It takes
20 minutes - 1.5 hours - Waiting time
5 minutes for physical checkup
2 minutes for shots
1 minute for blood work and PPD
2 minutes to pay initial fee
48-72 hours for PPD results ( Since labs are very very busy, they may take upto 4 days to send them blood work report)
After 48-72 hours
30-40 minutes wait to show your ppd result
1 minute - Dr to see PPD result
10 minutes - for xray if ppd positive
5 minutes - other shots if your blood report says so
5-10 minutes - for dr to read x-ray
2 minutes to pay for remaining fees
30 minutes - wait to get your sealed envelop ( otherwise go next day)
more...
house more.
Lasantha
06-25 02:27 PM
MrWaitingGC,
My H1B is valid till April of 2008. When i went for vacation and entered the country in March 2007, the guy at the border patrol did some mistake and put the date on I-94 as 16th sep of 2007 instead of April 2008.
I tried to get it corrected at the local CBP office but could not do it ... So i am planning to make a trip to Canada before my visa stamp expries to get a new I-94 which is valid till April 2008.
But since i have sent my passport for renewal, i am not sure if ic an make the trip bfr my I-94 expires.
And also i am not sure if i can file for extension of my H1B as it is more than 6 months ( it is about 10 months eatly) before the expiration date on my current H1B.
At this point i am helpless with out my passport. I hope i get it soon.
So what i wanted to find out is, is my status still legal after 16th sep 2007 if i file my 485 ...
OK, now I see your problem. You did not tell us about the error on the I-94. This looks like a question for your attorney.
My H1B is valid till April of 2008. When i went for vacation and entered the country in March 2007, the guy at the border patrol did some mistake and put the date on I-94 as 16th sep of 2007 instead of April 2008.
I tried to get it corrected at the local CBP office but could not do it ... So i am planning to make a trip to Canada before my visa stamp expries to get a new I-94 which is valid till April 2008.
But since i have sent my passport for renewal, i am not sure if ic an make the trip bfr my I-94 expires.
And also i am not sure if i can file for extension of my H1B as it is more than 6 months ( it is about 10 months eatly) before the expiration date on my current H1B.
At this point i am helpless with out my passport. I hope i get it soon.
So what i wanted to find out is, is my status still legal after 16th sep 2007 if i file my 485 ...
OK, now I see your problem. You did not tell us about the error on the I-94. This looks like a question for your attorney.
tattoo girlfriend selena gomez and
vgayalu
08-20 01:34 PM
I filed on June 29. Reached on July 2
Signed by Bermeyer.
No receipts are received and no checks are cashed.
Signed by Bermeyer.
No receipts are received and no checks are cashed.
more...
pictures more.
niklshah
08-28 10:37 AM
Guys pls stop taking useless info pass appointments. People like me who have not received EAD and may loose the job are not able to get infopass appointments because of all the people taking appt to know the 485 status. Pls understand......
dresses 2010 emo love quotes english
optimist
06-22 01:34 PM
...The idea is to have atleast a few solid evidences and then add in the rest but dont clutter the whole thing in a way that they miss the most important ones...
I agree with what thomachan72 says. You are better off sending only the necessary documents to keep your case crisp, instead of confusing the adjudicator with reams of paperwork. I don't think you need to write a letter explaining non-availability of experience letter. I certainly DO NOT recommend bringing up the bond and other disputes with your previous employer.
Like you discovered yourself, your case got an RFE because of the missing document. With all the affidavits, paystubs and offer letter you have a clean case. Don't mess it up by giving too many unncessary documents.
Good luck to you, my friend.
I agree with what thomachan72 says. You are better off sending only the necessary documents to keep your case crisp, instead of confusing the adjudicator with reams of paperwork. I don't think you need to write a letter explaining non-availability of experience letter. I certainly DO NOT recommend bringing up the bond and other disputes with your previous employer.
Like you discovered yourself, your case got an RFE because of the missing document. With all the affidavits, paystubs and offer letter you have a clean case. Don't mess it up by giving too many unncessary documents.
Good luck to you, my friend.
more...
makeup amor te amo amor te quiero. mi
JunRN
09-17 08:05 PM
NSC is following FIFO. As per , NSC is adjudicating June 15 EAD filers as of the moment. So approximately, it will take 90 days from RNs for us to receive our EAD. However, this doesn't take into account surge in July filings. So, my best guess is, 90 to 120 days!
girlfriend dresses BMW 6-Series Coupe
div_bell_2003
03-05 02:29 PM
I have changed jobs after 180 days of filing my AOS, although it's in the same of similar classification and my attorney from the new company informed me that time that USCIS is generally very liberal with the "same or similar" classification, as long as the job duties don't change totally.
1) Do I have to ask Company B to apply for anything relating to my GC? I want to make sure that they know and agree to all costs associated with the paperwork? Dont want to end up paying from my pocket as I have heard in a few cases before
-- They may want to file an AC-21 letter ( stating that they have permanently employed you for this position for this salary yada yada yada ... ) and definitely a G28 to change representation on your cases in case of any RFE and other communication by USCIS.
2) I believe since my I-140 is approved for more than 180 days or actually my I-485 being filed for more than 180 days, I am allowed to move, correct?
-- Yes, albeit to a "same or similar" job.
3) Since my I-140 is approved and I have an EAD, can USCIS/Company A cause it to be revoked? OR it doesn't apply to my case?
-- USCIS has no business revoking your I-140, it's your previous employer's property which they may revoke at any time ( due to various issues, not necessarily to get back at you )
4) Do I need to ask Company A to maintain anything? Or just keeping good relations with them is enough :)
-- Keeping a good relation never hurts, but company A doesn't have to maintain anything for you. Good luck in your search !
1) Do I have to ask Company B to apply for anything relating to my GC? I want to make sure that they know and agree to all costs associated with the paperwork? Dont want to end up paying from my pocket as I have heard in a few cases before
-- They may want to file an AC-21 letter ( stating that they have permanently employed you for this position for this salary yada yada yada ... ) and definitely a G28 to change representation on your cases in case of any RFE and other communication by USCIS.
2) I believe since my I-140 is approved for more than 180 days or actually my I-485 being filed for more than 180 days, I am allowed to move, correct?
-- Yes, albeit to a "same or similar" job.
3) Since my I-140 is approved and I have an EAD, can USCIS/Company A cause it to be revoked? OR it doesn't apply to my case?
-- USCIS has no business revoking your I-140, it's your previous employer's property which they may revoke at any time ( due to various issues, not necessarily to get back at you )
4) Do I need to ask Company A to maintain anything? Or just keeping good relations with them is enough :)
-- Keeping a good relation never hurts, but company A doesn't have to maintain anything for you. Good luck in your search !
hairstyles more.
bomber
07-03 11:34 AM
Guys,
The AILA article may not be sufficient to explain how exactly we've been hurt. I've added a few more lines in the end and emailed to some of these addresses:
A======
Losses suffered by my family and tens of thousands of others:
1) Cost of medical exams and having to take vaccinations
2) Attorney fees
3) Cost of getting paperwork expedited from home countris
4) Cost of time off from work to prepare the applications
5) Postage/Fedex
6) People canceling their non-refundable tickets for summer travel so they could be in this country
7) People having to spend a lot of extra money to fly their families back.
8) People having to change their marriage plans and having to pay for cancellations of a lot of events.
6) Emotional trauma our families had to go through. A spouse who is forced to sit at home for many years was shown a hope for being able to work and that hope being shattered
MY BIG QUESTION IS :
Could the federal government have been able to get away with something like this if it had affected 100 US Citizens? NO!
In this case, it harmed, financially and emotionally devastated atleast 150-200 thousand FAMILIES, but those were of Legal hi-tech foreign workers....Who cares about them !
The AILA article may not be sufficient to explain how exactly we've been hurt. I've added a few more lines in the end and emailed to some of these addresses:
A======
Losses suffered by my family and tens of thousands of others:
1) Cost of medical exams and having to take vaccinations
2) Attorney fees
3) Cost of getting paperwork expedited from home countris
4) Cost of time off from work to prepare the applications
5) Postage/Fedex
6) People canceling their non-refundable tickets for summer travel so they could be in this country
7) People having to spend a lot of extra money to fly their families back.
8) People having to change their marriage plans and having to pay for cancellations of a lot of events.
6) Emotional trauma our families had to go through. A spouse who is forced to sit at home for many years was shown a hope for being able to work and that hope being shattered
MY BIG QUESTION IS :
Could the federal government have been able to get away with something like this if it had affected 100 US Citizens? NO!
In this case, it harmed, financially and emotionally devastated atleast 150-200 thousand FAMILIES, but those were of Legal hi-tech foreign workers....Who cares about them !
chinna2003
07-13 02:08 PM
There was life before green card. There is life after green card. And then there will be a realization afterwards that greencard is nothning but an official identification of a person that is willing to be a slave to the American System and then going to india and acting as a VIP .
Your value will always be equal to shit in this system and when you go to India what you earn here is shit compared to what you are losing by staying here.
Dont act desperate. if you get a green card let them give it you . Dont beg for it. they need you and dont act like you are on your knees swearing to do anything for a greencard.Otherwise we will all be like dirty who.... s
Your value will always be equal to shit in this system and when you go to India what you earn here is shit compared to what you are losing by staying here.
Dont act desperate. if you get a green card let them give it you . Dont beg for it. they need you and dont act like you are on your knees swearing to do anything for a greencard.Otherwise we will all be like dirty who.... s
bhatiap
07-03 05:26 PM
I have sent an email to US Senator Dianne Feinstein, California.
Please send an email to your Senators.
Please send an email to your Senators.
No comments:
Post a Comment